The Beckwith Combatives System

The Art of Command (Excerpt) 

Terrance Jones

Founder

The JISS Corporation

D1A7- Beckwith Combative System- The Plan of War (Clausewitz/On War topic)

Absolute war can be complex in regards to its  premise . What is the difference between absolute war and war, or is it parallel or tandem use of these variables and terms. It can be both and first we will cover the distinction of the combat concerning absolute war and war in a general sense. Absolute indicates a constant and diversity of ideological opponents that are diametrically opposed to one another’s existence based on sustainable articulations and implementation of these inclinations and principles. This is the constancy of war, it is an absolute of war because it covers all of society, all ideologies and all ethnicities. It is absolute and it is constant, good versus evil, because war is a grave matter of the state (Sun Tzu) and opponents often have diametrically opposed ideologies. Such opponents could conceivably always oppose each other through the cycle of seasons (Sun Tzu), dropping off picking up, yin and yang(Sun Tzu) until one has conquered the other. This doesn’t happen at a moments notice or in a days passage, so war is a constant, whether its physically or psychological. Now there is another absolute war and general war distinction and these are tandem continuity factors and variables, but they are also distinctive and separate. Absolute and general, absolute because they represent a constancy of conflict and engagement of diametrically opposed ideologies, but it occurs from single region, psychology to physicality premise variables. So war is also general, this is the third expansion on the absoluteness of war by a real time theater engagement that has the potential to expand and set back nations. One singular assimilation or accumulation of opposing nation states also occurs because war is a grave matter of the state (Sun Tzu), so we know on this basis, in this specific case, there is an absolute real threat and it is due to war that has trascended the psychological basis and premise and created armed physical conflicts on the ground and in the air. Because you can have both, there are circumstances where both transcend, when one power or coalition is engaged with a moderately skilled contingent and facing global threats that are not global because of an accumulation or assimilation of overt regional forces, but because of technology, resources and the viability of the enemy’s strategies and tactics. This is absolute and general war in the most threatening way, physical.

D1A8- Beckwith Combative System- War as an instrument of policy (Clausewitz/On War topic)

Sun Tsu says  that war has a note. This is artistry. The correlation to music. Assimilation of notes that create a centerpiece, like a song. That is viable, that is classic, that is projecting artistry in regards to military science  that leads to compliance because of the viability of the same, and reduces, like music, the provocative physicality and inclinations of man when he is aggressive and violent. These scenarios often occur when man has indulged the delusions of vanity. When they do not project force because of defense, when their attack is not defense it is because they have deviated from what is important to their nations, their regional neighbors and the global community. This is the worst case of an accumulation and assimilation of morally deficient tendencies. War as an instrument of policy(Clausewitz), when the premise is good, morally just, morally viable to the point where the Just War Theory is universally acceptable, you will have force multipliers  that create force projection capabilities. This will be tantamount to creating artistry in war. Taking, snatching the resolve with a strategic thought concerning the enemy. Taking his inclination to even combat it viably in any sense, physically, this is artistry. using war as an instrument, psychologically then physically, to defend a policy that was based on moral viability and Just War Theory optimized to moral competencies and continuities, this is the distinction of the combat. Morally viable versus morally deficient. Two diametrically opposed constants of war. This equates to war being a grave matter of the state as Sun Tzu suggests and articulates and history has validated the truthfulness of such articulations.

The Beckwith Combatives System was created to provide the U.S. military with strategic and tactical benefits concerning the founder’s “triangular thought” concepts as they relate to military warfare “(moral viability/psychology/physicality). The Beckwith Combatives System is based on classic warfighting principles and articulations that minimize force deterioration and PTSD occurrence while optimizing casualty aversion. Here is a brief look at some the disciplines covered by the Beckwith Combatives System:

Just War Theory

Controlled Space Convergence

Hand to Hand Combatives (HHC- Psychology/Martial Arts/Combat Knife Combatives)

SERE Combatives (An Extension of Col. Rowe's Fort Bragg Model)

*The Beckwith Combatives System was significantly influenced by my training under Vietnam Veteran and fomer U.S. Army stick fighting Champion and ninja arts expert Joseph Catlett and 7th Dan, Shaolin Kung Fu expert Tyrone Bullock.

*I am currently training under the proven capabilities of Martial Arts expert Lloyd Irvin's (Brazilian Jiu Jitsu and Submission Expert) multiple discipline martial arts training. A humbling experience indeed for the moment.  

http://www.lloydirvinlive.com/sales_bjj.html 

Terrance Jones

Founder by the Grace of Jehovah who is Alpha and Omega

The Beckwith Combatives System